The secure Mac: myth or legend? Part II
October 12th, 2007 by David Braue
Here is part two of David Braue's look at whether the Mac is really more secure than other PC operating systems. (Part one is here.)
While most computer users tend to equate computer security with the risk of getting a virus, the more serious problems come from socially engineered attacks that can and do suck in users of Macs as easily as those using Windows machines.
Symantec's Norton Confidential security suite for Macs, for example, doesn't even mention the word "virus" in its product literature but instead uses the blanket phrase "vulnerability protection", which also includes issues such as operating system patches, protection from phishing e-mails, and online content filters.
This change in marketing tactic reflects the different reality of security on Windows and Mac machines -- but users shouldn't let their guard down even if the Mac is more inherently resilient. Mike Romo, US-based product manager for Macintosh products with Symantec, says that even Mac users need to consider the ongoing risk of macro viruses -- which rely on vulnerabilities in applications rather than operating systems -- and the potential role of Macs as transmitters of Windows viruses attached to forward e-mails.
"We're not so much worried about the infrastructure anymore," he explains. "It used to be people thinking about doing a weekly virus scan, but now it's people making sure the Web sites they visit are legitimate. This is a fundamental shift about how we discuss Internet security: the boxes themselves are much more stable than they've ever been. Apple has made sure the baseline defences of the system are already so high out of the box that for the most part, people don't need to think about them."
That doesn't mean Mac users -- many of whom adopted the platform because it is seen as being easy to use and secure -- can ignore the threat of security attacks altogether. Mac OS X ships with so many built-in system features -- including remote access software, the Apache Web server, IPFW firewall, and other components -- that Long says it's important that users take a few precautions even if they're not running antivirus software.
Long recommends every Mac user take two steps to improve their system security. First, he recommends that they turn on IPFW, which isn't necessarily turned on by default (System Preferences / Sharing / Firewall / Start). Second, he advises users to turn off the 'Open "safe" files after downloading' option in Safari (Safari / Preferences / General), which increases the chance that any new exploit-laden file could have a clear shot at the system.
"The things that worry me about Mac OS X have to do with the ways in which Apple tries to make things easy," he says.
Another potentially worrying issue with the Mac is the growing number of people using Apple's Boot Camp or virtualisation software -- such as SWsoft Parallels and VMware Fusion -- to run Windows on their new Macs. Users need to be aware that even though a virtual Windows machine is running on a Mac, it's still vulnerable to the same problems as on a standalone machine -- and, therefore, needs the same kind of virus protection.
At a minimum, free antivirus software like Grisoft's AVG Anti-Virus Free Edition or ALWIL Software's free avast! antivirus should be installed on any Mac-based Windows installation to provide essential protection.
This isn't only for protecting the Windows system: while the design of virtualisation software inherently separates the Windows system from the host Mac computer, it's also a dead certainty that someone, somewhere, is trying to figure out how to use virtual Windows images as a back-door to attack a host Mac machine.
Another potentially game-changing issue when it comes to Mac security is the iPhone. Apple has so far closely managed developers' interaction with the new device, but an inevitable raised profile for developers means the company needs to ensure its security model is consistent with that in OS X. "The iPhone is the beginning of a completely new mobile platform," says Romo. "I hope Apple will open it up to third party developers, but I also see why they're not doing it at this early stage."
"Apple takes security very seriously," he continues. "For the most part, 99 percent of the time, Mac users should feel pretty good about their purchase, and feel great about walking into the world of Mac OS X, and trust Apple and companies like Symantec to be at the forefront of security and looking out to make sure people are protected."







I bought to av cable and my ipod classic plays movies on my tv but not my iPod touch! the videos play for like one second and then backs out to the videos menu. Do i really have to buy the cable directly from Apple? How am I having problems with the newer ipod rather than this old 5th generation ipod! Suggestions anyone?
John
October 16th, 2007 at 4:10am
"it’s also a dead certainty that someone, somewhere, is trying to figure out how to use virtual Windows images as a back-door to attack a host Mac machine". I think this is a debatable statement. If a Mac is running Windows via boot camp then it it is already as vulnerable as any other Windows machine and no extra effort is required by the bad guys to compromise it. If it is running running a virtual installation of Windows, that vm is also as vulnerable as any Windows machine. Your statement suggests that efforts are being made to write Windows malware that would somehow take advantage of Windows flaws to attack OS X on the host machine. Not only is this a very small target population it would require knowledge of Windows and Mac OS X and possession of a machine to develop on. Not a very likely scenario for those motivated by profit... Also, if a bad guy has a Mac to work on the above scenario he would be better of putting his efforts into a straight compromise for OS X as that would be a larger target than Windows on Mac in the first place.